Dr. Ravel, I am a beginner for xafs analysis. I installed the Demeter on my laptop. I found there was always a black command widow when I start athena or artermis. If I close that window, the program was also closed. My operation system is windows 7. Why?
Shaofeng > -----原始邮件----- > 发件人: "Bruce Ravel" <bra...@bnl.gov> > 发送时间: 2012年10月23日 星期二 > 收件人: "XAFS Analysis using Ifeffit" <ifeffit@millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov> > 抄送: > 主题: Re: [Ifeffit] Running (D)Artemis yields different result from that shown > in (D)Artemis instruction videos > > > OK, you've convinced me. > > When I got into the lab this afternoon, I tried the same fit on a > Windows computer. Much to my surprise, the result on Windows was > quite different from the result on my linux computers at home. > > After a few hours of investigation, I found a problem in how Ifeffit > had been compiled on the Windows machine that I use to build the > Windows installer. > > I was able to come up with a short-term solution and then built a new > installer package for 0.9.13 which i think works correctly. > > I will be announcing a new release shortly. > > B > > > > On Monday, October 22, 2012 06:41:26 AM Tsuei, Ku-Ding wrote: > > Bruce, > > > > Perhaps you noticed the "Fit color" was red (large R-factor 0.074496, > > poor fit, also seen in the attached figure in the last email) when you > > loaded in the project file I sent you. When you hit Fit button again the > > "Fit color" might turn to green indicating good fit as shown in your > > result of a much smaller R-factor (0.004265). > > > > I did the following test on various versions of Demeter on my desktop > > and notebook computers both installed with Windows 7 SP1. Of course I > > uninstalled one version first before installing another. I tried to use > > Uninstall within the Program menu or use the Program manager. I tried to > > reboot or not to reboot after uninstallation or installation. Neither > > shows any difference. > > > > Fit color > > 0.9.10 green > > 0.9.11 red > > 0.9.12 red > > 0.9.13 red > > > > Only version 0.9.10 yields good fit. The latter versions would not give > > good fits even with repeated hitting the "Fit" button. I have no idea > > what causes these results but perhaps this observation provides a clue. > > > > Ku-Ding > > > > On 2012/10/22 上午 01:00, ifeffit-requ...@millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov wrote: > > > Send Ifeffit mailing list submissions to > > > > > > ifeffit@millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov > > > > > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > > > > > > http://millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/ifeffit > > > > > > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > > > > > > ifeffit-requ...@millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov > > > > > > You can reach the person managing the list at > > > > > > ifeffit-ow...@millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov > > > > > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > > > than "Re: Contents of Ifeffit digest..." > > > > > > Today's Topics: > > > 1. Re: Running (D)Artemis yields different result from that > > > > > > shown in (D)Artemis instruction videos (Ravel, Bruce) > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > Message: 1 > > > Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2012 12:36:10 +0000 > > > From: "Ravel, Bruce"<bra...@bnl.gov> > > > To: XAFS Analysis using Ifeffit<ifeffit@millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov> > > > Subject: Re: [Ifeffit] Running (D)Artemis yields different result from > > > > > > that shown in (D)Artemis instruction videos > > > > > > Message-ID: > > > <47ced3cd722c2a439c0d1d1056b2132517c3b...@ex10-mb1.bnl.gov> > > > > > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > > > > > > > > > Ku-Ding, > > > > > > I don't know what to tell you. On the computer I am sitting in front of > > > right now, I opened your two project files and hit the fit buttons, I get > > > the same fit with only numerical differences. Here I am cutting and > > > pasting from the two log files:> > > > old artemis: > > > Chi-square = 4334.684537717 > > > Reduced Chi-square = 691.819976095 > > > R-factor = 0.004250325 > > > > > > amp = 0.8649100 +/- 0.0412220 (1.0000) > > > enot = 5.6049380 +/- 0.2950270 (0.0000) > > > delr = -0.0226780 +/- 0.0023790 (0.0000) > > > ss = 0.0082230 +/- 0.0003250 (0.0030) > > > > > > new artemis: > > > Chi-square : 4348.7359268 > > > Reduced chi-square : 694.0625918 > > > R-factor : 0.0042652 > > > > > > amp = 0.86526150 # +/- 0.04129645 [1.00000] > > > enot = 5.61081742 # +/- 0.29527844 [0] > > > delr = -0.02266589 # +/- 0.00238341 [0] > > > ss = 0.00822546 # +/- 0.00032571 [0.00300] > > > > > > I don't acknowledge that there is a problem. > > > > > > B > > > > > > > > > ________________________________________ > > > From:ifeffit-boun...@millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov > > > [ifeffit-boun...@millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov] on behalf of Tsuei, Ku-Ding > > > [ts...@nsrrc.org.tw] Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2012 1:15 PM > > > To:ifeffit@millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov > > > Subject: [Ifeffit] Running (D)Artemis yields different result from that > > > shown in (D)Artemis instruction videos > > > > > > Hi Bruce, > > > > > > I went through your (D)Artemis instruction videos and ran the latest > > > Demetris 0.9.12 with 0.9.13 update side by side to reproduce the > > > results. However, my running yields much poorer fitting results on Au > > > foil EXAFS, even the first shell (video 03). Actually it happened using > > > the older 0.9.11 too. I also went through your Lecture videos shot at > > > Diamond and ran (D)Artemis but could reproduce your results closely. I > > > have felt puzzled for quite a while why the simplest case Au foil does > > > work well. Today I tried to run the same Au data and fitting by the old, > > > last version of Artemis 0.8.014. I could produce very good fitting on > > > the first shell with the R-factor very near that shown in the video. I > > > made sure the math expressions for the fitting parameters amp, enot, > > > delr and ss are set exactly the same, with fitting range exactly the > > > same, in both programs. Their screen outputs file is attached. The saved > > > respective project files are also attached. I copied the fit outputs > > > into their journals. I would appreciate if you may review these results > > > and help clear my puzzle. > > > > > > Best regards, > > > > > > Ku-Ding > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Ifeffit mailing list > > > Ifeffit@millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov > > > http://millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/ifeffit > > > > > > > > > End of Ifeffit Digest, Vol 116, Issue 11 > > > **************************************** > > > . > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Ifeffit mailing list > > Ifeffit@millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov > > http://millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/ifeffit > > > -- > > Bruce Ravel ------------------------------------ bra...@bnl.gov > > National Institute of Standards and Technology > Synchrotron Methods Group at NSLS --- Beamlines U7A, X24A, X23A2 > Building 535A > Upton NY, 11973 > > Homepage: http://xafs.org/BruceRavel > Software: https://github.com/bruceravel > > _______________________________________________ > Ifeffit mailing list > Ifeffit@millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov > http://millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/ifeffit
_______________________________________________ Ifeffit mailing list Ifeffit@millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov http://millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/ifeffit