Matt is correct. The graphics in Larch are much better than the graphics in the 
old version of ifeffit. 

I may go back to using the command line. 


On Mar 26, 2013, at 6:12 PM, Matt Newville <> wrote:

> The poor quality of the graphics in the older versions of Ifeffit /
> Horae was always been a disappointment to me.   It's certainly
> reasonable to say that exporting to another program is necessary, but
> I believe the latest versions should and do have much higher quality
> graphics.   Larch certainly has much better graphics than Ifeffit.
> See for example:
> In the on-line docs, the graphics may look mediocre because they are
> scaled, but if you click on them you will see the PNG file created
> directly by saving the image from the Plot window (or cut with Ctrl-C
> and pasted directly into presentation software).   Another example
> (from the feffit chapter):
> shows the Greek characters and mathematical rendering, generated using
> latex notation.   Depending on what you need, these may publication
> quality graphs,and they can be copied directly from the Plotting
> windows into other applications (for example, Ctrl-C to copy to
> clipboard works).   The axis labels (plain text or latex),  colors,
> symbols, line widths, and so on can be adjusted from a Plot
> Configuration window after the plot is drawn, see
> There are many things that cannot be done simply with these plots
> (figure-in-figure, complex stacking), but in principle, Larch can be
> used to generate any of the kinds of plots available from the
> matplotlib library, see

Ifeffit mailing list

Reply via email to