Your feff inp has a Sn atom 2Ang away from your absorbing Sn.
Should that be substituting for a Ge at ~2.6Ang instead?

2Ang is too short a distance for Sn-Sn metallic/covalent...2.8 - 3.0 would be
more reasonable.

*   x          y          z     ipot   tag    distance   occupancy
 -0.000000   0.000000   0.000000 0  Sn(abs)    0.00000         *1
 -1.379100   1.447800   0.075150 1     Sn    2.00092         *1
  1.483650  -1.502850   1.483200 2     Ge    2.58063         *1
  1.528650   1.506600  -1.445400 2     Ge    2.58762         *1
 -1.487700  -1.531050  -1.488750 2     Ge    2.60264         *1
 -1.423050   1.539600   1.552350 2     Ge    2.60868         *1


On 2024-12-04 12:38 p.m., Anis Attiaoui via Ifeffit wrote:
Dear Matt and Community, I am having a problem related to a specific .inp file when I am trying to generate the inp file from its corresponding cif with feff8. I am attaching the .cif and feff. inp. The error I am getting is the following: ‘’
ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerStart
This Message Is From an External Sender
This message came from outside your organization.
ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerEnd

Dear Matt and Community,

I am having a problem related to a specific .inp file when I am trying to generate the inp file from its corresponding cif with feff8. I am attaching the .cif and feff.inp.

The error I am getting is the following:

‘’
Calculating potentials ...

    free atom potential and density for atom type    0

    free atom potential and density for atom type    1

    free atom potential and density for atom type    2

    initial state energy

    overlapped potential and density for unique potential    0

    overlapped potential and density for unique potential    1

    overlapped potential and density for unique potential    2

    muffin tin radii and interstitial parameters

    : ipot, Norman radius, Muffin tin radius, Overlap

         0  1.49498E+00  1.39776E+00 1.15000E+00

         1  1.20678E+00  8.53844E-01 1.15000E+00

         2  1.56883E+00  1.42805E+00 1.15000E+00

tell authors to INCREASE NOVP

‘’

I did try to run the same cif using ARTEMIS and it worked wo any issues using the feff6L instead of version 8.

Thus, I tried to use the new Larixite ciff2feffinp module and use the feff6L instead of version 8 but I noticed this is not installed yet.

I also found that a similar issue has previously been documented but I didn’t find any clear answers in there.

https://urldefense.us/v3/__https://millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov/feff/feffusers/msg00255.html__;!!G_uCfscf7eWS!fvHQb0nxllgYu-SSz354Igq35CXW1gvCHSsL4yGFfDNF4GhnQ-gsvM1StVpo1hzYtxShy_fDjSBjx1ML_PAkTKsuLol1kMub66v3UAs$ <https://urldefense.us/v3/__https://millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov/feff/feffusers/msg00255.html__;!!G_uCfscf7eWS!d4zCEY4ekn5zZel7Bu4LVMYWoUXb0ztBEVVdZtvXcqAiiCGMkRPs5D8XlhasK96Dh4qDBC_f6dhx-e5ZHS0gvof8CvZVJKY$>

Any suggestions will be tremendously appreciated.

Thank you very much.

Dr. Anis Attiaoui,

*Stanford University, GLAM*

Dept. Material Science and Engineering,

McCullough Building,

476 Lomita Mall, Stanford

California, USA, 94305

Office/shipping: McC-203

Tel: _+1(6__50)485-0501_

Web: https://urldefense.us/v3/__https://mcintyre.stanford.edu__;!!G_uCfscf7eWS!fvHQb0nxllgYu-SSz354Igq35CXW1gvCHSsL4yGFfDNF4GhnQ-gsvM1StVpo1hzYtxShy_fDjSBjx1ML_PAkTKsuLol1kMub9lu0RTA$ <https://urldefense.us/v3/__https://mcintyre.stanford.edu/__;!!G_uCfscf7eWS!d4zCEY4ekn5zZel7Bu4LVMYWoUXb0ztBEVVdZtvXcqAiiCGMkRPs5D8XlhasK96Dh4qDBC_f6dhx-e5ZHS0gvof8gJt6uVY$>


ifeffit mailing list:https://urldefense.us/v3/__https://millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov/mailman3/lists/ifeffit.millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov/__;!!G_uCfscf7eWS!fvHQb0nxllgYu-SSz354Igq35CXW1gvCHSsL4yGFfDNF4GhnQ-gsvM1StVpo1hzYtxShy_fDjSBjx1ML_PAkTKsuLol1kMubM2tNdTs$ to unsubscribe, send mail toifeffit-le...@millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov
ifeffit mailing list:  
https://millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov/mailman3/lists/ifeffit.millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov/
to unsubscribe, send mail to ifeffit-le...@millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov

Reply via email to