This was posted on the novttp list (see below) - We just started using the 3.8 
version and we are now concerned about what is reported here. Is there really 
no longer a Conflict bin and do deleted items really not go in to the Trash? 
This could be a deal breaker for our users...
 
>>> On 2/25/2010 at 10:56 AM, in message <4B869DD7.C96 : 160 : 44182>, "Matt 
>>> Zufelt" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Like Hans, we have been running iFolder 2 for years and it has been 
> absolutely solid.  With Windows 7 64-bit machines starting to show up, it 
> became time to move forward.  We installed an iFolder 3.8 server (on OES2) 
> and were very underwhelmed.  What was a fantastic product in version 2 is a 
> dog in version 3.  I've now taken the same opinion as Bob and have dumped 
> iFolder.
>  
> The final straw for me was when iFolder 3 lost data.  With iFolder 2, there 
> was a conflict bin plus deleted files went to the recycle bin on the synced 
> clients.  No such luck with iFolder 3.  I found that a guaranteed way to lose 
> data was something as simple as using the same filename twice in semi-rapid 
> succession.  
>  
> The scenario that caused data loss for us (multiple times):  a user decides 
> to do some housekeeping.  In his iFolder, he has a file called important.doc. 
>  For whatever reason, he has an updated copy of important.doc on some other 
> media (such as a flash drive) or other location outside his iFolder.  If the 
> user renames important.doc in his iFolder to important.bak and then copies in 
> important.doc from the other location, iFolder corrupts the file because he 
> re-used the "important.doc" filename before iFolder has had a chance to fully 
> sync to all connected computers.  The result in each case is the newly copied 
> in important.doc file gets replaced with a zero-byte file that gets synced 
> down from the iFolder server.  The overwritten important.doc is then gone: no 
> conflict bin, not moved to the trash can.  I personally lost four hours of 
> lecture preparation to this "feature".  Fortunately for me I had printed a 
> hard copy just before iFolder replaced my file with a zero-byte version.
>  
> We experienced this data loss at least three times.  At that point we dumped 
> iFolder.
>  
> I have since had some of my users start using Microsoft's (free) Live Sync 
> (http://www.foldershare.com).  It has all of the stability of iFolder 2, the 
> ability to have multiple synced folders like iFolder 3, and has support for 
> Windows 7 64-bit which was important for us.  It also does not require us to 
> run any kind of central server.  Microsoft brokers the connections and the 
> computers sync directly from one to the other.  I also use Live Sync on my 
> own computers and have been pleased with it.  I use my office computer as my 
> primary connection as it is always on.  My other computers (laptop, etc.) 
> sync to the office computer anytime they are booted and have a live Internet 
> connection.
>  
> The connections and transfers are done via SSL encrypted sessions, and since 
> the Microsoft Live servers broker the connections, firewalls are not an issue 
> and VPNs are not necessary.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download Intel&#174; Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
_______________________________________________
ifolder-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ifolder-devel

Reply via email to