Tzafrir Cohen wrote: > On Fri, Sep 02, 2005 at 10:34:00PM +0300, Lior Kaplan wrote: > > >>Than use the multidisk array to create a beter raid (raid 5 and not 0), >>over that to have LVM for the base filesystems. > > > But isn't this a waste of disk space?
Sure. But it this way we gain more stability through redundancy. >>I'd like to seperate some filesystems to have better use of disk space >>(/tmp & /home). >> >>clean the server packages. There are many interpreters: >>main/interpreters libxml-rss-perl >>main/interpreters libdate-calc-perl >>main/interpreters libtemplate-perl >>main/interpreters python2.1 >>main/interpreters libdate-manip-perl >>main/interpreters libcgi-application-perl >> >>Do why really need them all? >> > > > Besides python, the others are simply perl modules, right? Yes. >>same for development packages (libc6-dev, kernel-headers, gcc). Did >>someone used the server for his developemnt station? Or to build source >>code? I don't think that the way stuff should work on production. >> >>There are packages from dotdeb: >>ii libmysqlclient 4.1.12-0.dotde mysql database client library >>ii php4 4.3.11-0.dotde server-side, HTML-embedded scripting >>languag >>ii php4-cgi 4.3.11-0.dotde server-side, HTML-embedded scripting >>languag >>ii php4-common 4.3.11-0.dotde Common files for packages built from >>the php >>ii php4-mysql 4.3.11-0.dotde MySQL module for php4 > > > Sounds like a good idea > > >>ii qmail 1.03-37.dotdeb Secure, reliable, efficient, simple >>mail tra > > > Is there any "official" qmail deb? no. qmail has a restriction on binary re-distribution. So debian provides a packages which builds the binary on your machine, instead of providing you with the binary as usual. More info at http://packages.debian.org/stable/mail/qmail-src So it seems that dot deb is violating the qmail license. Unless they got special consent from qmail upstream. -- Regards, Lior Kaplan [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.Guides.co.il Debian GNU/Linux unstable (SID)
