Wow, thank you for your very quick answer, Tamás! On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 12:10 PM, Tamás Nepusz <[email protected]> wrote: >> I also tried to ignore the weights, by using the option >> "weights=E(net)$NA", but it didn't work. > You should use weights=NA if you want to ignore the weights (as far as I > know).
Yes... you are right, sorry! I used weights=NA, but I wrote it wrong in the mail. Thanks ;) > Also, do you happen to have any pathological weights in your graph (like > negative weights or zeros)? No, each of the weights have positive values. Actually I am forcing my graph to have all the weights equal 1, in order to compare it with the original graph with different, but positive, weights. Best, Charles > > -- > T. > > > _______________________________________________ > igraph-help mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/igraph-help -- Um axé! :) -- Charles Novaes de Santana http://www.imedea.uib-csic.es/~charles PhD student - Global Change Laboratorio Internacional de Cambio Global Department of Global Change Research Instituto Mediterráneo de Estudios Avanzados(CSIC/UIB) Calle Miquel Marques 21, 07190 Esporles - Islas Baleares - España Office phone - +34 971 610 896 Cell phone - +34 660 207 940 _______________________________________________ igraph-help mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/igraph-help
