Sorry guys I didn't know that "average", "localaverage" and
"localaverageundirected" were meant to gave the same ressults. Since we can
specify vertex ids for "local" transitivity I sort of misunderstood that
"localaverage" and "localaverageundirected" would also let me do that, and I
didn't see in the R igraph documentation that "average", "localaverage" and
"localaverageundirected" are different names for the same thing.
________________________________
From: Gábor Csárdi <[email protected]>
To: sudeep s <[email protected]>; Help for igraph users
<[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, 28 February 2013 4:42 PM
Subject: Re: [igraph] local average transitivity
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 2:59 AM, sudeep s <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi all,
>I was calculating local average transitivity for my graph and I found somthing
>a bit odd, calculating the average transitivity for the whole graph and local
>average transitivity for a set of vertices gave me the same value,
>
>
[...]
After checking the R code for function transitivity I saw that transitivity
types "average", "localaverage" and "localaverageundirected" is calling the
same external method
They are different names for the same thing, for convenience. If you think they
are not defined correctly and/or give wrong results, please tell us why you
think that and what would be the correct definition/result.
[...]
Is this a possible bug in R igraph ?
>
I don't think so.
Gabor
I found this same thing with igraph package versions igraph_0.6.4 and
igraph_0.6.3
>
>Thank you,
>
>Regards,
>Sudeep.
>
>_______________________________________________
>igraph-help mailing list
>[email protected]
>https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/igraph-help
>
>
--
Gabor Csardi <[email protected]> MTA KFKI RMKI
_______________________________________________
igraph-help mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/igraph-help
