On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 8:59 PM, Nilesh Govindarajan <[email protected]>wrote:
> On 09/03/2010 08:55 PM, Nilesh Govindarajan wrote: > >> On 09/03/2010 02:33 AM, Narendra Sisodiya wrote: >> >>> But I think this will create a readonly pendrive, infact BIOS will treat >>> your USB as USB CD/DVD writer. >>> You are just writing cdfs on USB. >>> If you do so, system will be slow as DVD booting need good RAM. I prefer >>> Unetbootin. you can use any ISO and install over usb pendrive. >>> >>> -- >>> l...@iitd - http://tinyurl.com/ycueutm >>> >> >> True, it will be read only. >> But there's one advantage of using USB-cdfs instead of direct cd - speed. >> USB transfers are much faster than CD transfers. :) >> >> > Unetbootin is also a good one. > I think grub too supports booting from ISO, never tried it though. > So, a dissatisfied person could install grub, format the pen drive as > vfat/ext*/jfs/*, load in some ISO's and configure grub :D > (Just kidding, don't take it seriously) > Unetbootin is Good.. BUT WINDOW is CRAp WINDOW is CRAP.... I gave linux usb to my office friend. He says that he is unable to boot usb. I checked and he was correct. I wrote again and again no booting. Later I found that he was inserting USB and then restarting the operating system. The moment he insert usb, windows virus create a new .ini files and make that USB unbootable. This is totally crappy news. I wanted to introduce SchoolOS live USB and many users will be not be able to use it just because of crappy windows. Nilesh, In that case CDFS is better.I think booting section must be with CDFS so that nobody can temper booting process. I am thinking that if it is possible to make 2 partition , then writing linux on CDFS and then mount home directory on other may solve this problem. -- > ┌─────────────────────────┐ │ Narendra Sisodiya │ http://narendrasisodiya.com └─────────────────────────┘ -- l...@iitd - http://tinyurl.com/ycueutm
