On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 1:16 PM, Kenneth Gonsalves <[email protected]>wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-12-16 at 13:06 +0530, Narendra Sisodiya wrote: > > > http://metastatic.org/text/the-gpl-is-not-viral.html > > > > > > > > well , you do have any other name or term for this ? What you call a > > license which dictate you to release Derived work under same license. > > I call it a bad license - restrictive of freedom. > > OMG. When will understand that this clause is not a restriction of freedom. I have playground and license such that everybody can do anything.It means some big and ziant body can come and restrict other for some freedom. So there is a clause which says, you cannot change license terms and conditions. This is something which GOD says to somebody- -- "This is your earth, do it what you want, but no restrict other to do so" This is not a restriction on freedom, everything is provided inside license terms and conditions. Why somebody want to change license form NPDL to something else. He can do same thing by embedded the article. Embedding is different then Derivative work. Example, a GNU/Linux Distro which is work of embedded several things at one place.. Example I have some articles which were released under NPDL, Now I am writing a book which is be fully copyrighted work. That book will be containing notice like (c) narendra sisodiya, section 2.34 is released under NPDL..... blah blah... and for everything else All right reserved ....bla bla... May you tell me why on earth somebody need to change NPDL to something else.. NPDL designed to server a license to a small category of user who want to share and "REMIX" most easily.. -- l...@iitd - http://tinyurl.com/ycueutm
