> First, I don't think rsync is faster. It generates file hashes before > sending/comparing files. Use a portable hdd connected via usb to > really see how significantly it can be slow. > rsync is significantly faster in my experience as well. Its extremely useful when only a few files need to be updated. I often use it to update a html page based site as per requirement from a local copy. When using a usb hdd all methods are limited to the read speed. G
-- LUG@IITD - http://tinyurl.com/ycueutm
