On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 8:44 PM, Nalin Savara <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 5:06 PM, Shantanu Gupta <[email protected]>wrote: > >> On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 4:10 PM, Nalin Savara <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 3:22 PM, ragsagar <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 3:07 PM, Nalin Savara <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi People... >>>>> >>>>> <snip> >>> >>> Thanks a ton ragsagar... that truely helps. >>> >> This seems to be worse than top posting ;) Nothing here helps... > >> Please don't "snip" responses/suggestions/solutions when you reply to a >> mailing list unless you have an appalling reason to do so. >> > > Buddy... Shantanu... reason for snipping is same as reason for not > top-posting-- > But when you send the same mail to many people/lists, and get a reply from one list, the other lists don't get to know what the reply is/was. Like it was in this case And. if you hate top posting so much, better do inline posting. Its much context aware. > that people getting dozens of messages in a digest find it impossible to > manage them because of large content size and repititions. > > Will therefore continue. > > Also, "apalling"-- means "horrifying"-- hence not sure what you meant when > you said: "unless you have a apalling reason...". > And since we seem to be getting pedantic, its "appalling" not "apalling". And its not just "horrifying" but also to appall is also to dismay -- Lots o' Luv, Phani Bhushan Let not your sense of morals prevent you from doing what is right - Isaac Asimov (Salvor Hardin in Foundation and Empire) Please avoid sending me Word or PowerPoint attachments. See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html -- -- Mailing list guidelines and other related articles: http://lug-iitd.org/Footer
