On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 7:14 AM, Michele Simionato <[email protected]> wrote: > Just for the people in this list: > > http://www.phyast.pitt.edu/~micheles/scheme/scheme20.html
I have revised the draft according to Aziz suggestions; notice that I have decided to put incremental compilers in the same class as interpreters, even if it could be considered technically incorrect. """ Interpreter semantics means that a program is fully evaluated at runtime, with no distinction between phases (for pure interpreters) or with interleaved expansion and evaluation phases (for incremental compilers). """ I have also added an example about the Guile semantics.
