On Jun 14, 2009, at 2:50 PM, Ramana Kumar wrote:
I thought this code would do what you say is impossible (I do believe
you, though =P).
What you're doing (in the code you posted) is pretty different from
what I said is not possible (in the message quoted below). Anyways,
I don't think you'll get far in the path you're taking. You need a
simpler solution (and a simpler problem): one that you can easily
explain and handle, instead of the trap you're setting for yourself.
Aziz,,,
On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 9:25 PM, Abdulaziz
Ghuloum<aghul...@gmail.com> wrote:
It's the same thing. You want to handle the syntax-error
exception by
replacing the offending expression with another one of your choice.
The replacement may be just #f or (asserion-violation 'foo "unbound")
or whatever. Still, not possible to do correctly without hacking on
psyntax.
