On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 5:07 AM, Derick Eddington<[email protected]> wrote: > R6RS's versioning-in-library-names is complicated to the point of being > flawed [1], unfortunately.
What about your SRFI-would be? Will it appear eventually, with some alternative proposal for versioning or will it give up versioning, or did you renounce to propose it altogether (I hope not)?
