On Sat, 2010-01-09 at 20:39 -0800, Derick Eddington wrote: > http://srfi.schemers.org/srfi-103/mail-archive/msg00091.html
> 1) Should the implicit file name support be removed? The sole motivation for > it > is so that (sub-)collections of files can be distributed and managed as > stand-alone directories which can be moved around or deleted without having to > remember and deal with straggler files outside the directory. However, having > stand-alone directories can instead be accomplished with an explicit "main" or > some other naming convention (i.e. instead of (foo) use (foo main)). Also, > removing the implicit file name will remove the exceptional mapping of library > names (--- main), (--- _main), etc. I personally am (now) neutral about > removing the implicit file name. I'm OK with it being removed. Ed
