On Tue, 2010-04-13 at 01:01 +0200, Andreas Rottmann wrote: > Derick Eddington <[email protected]> writes:
> >> I'm not a big fan of bzr, and would rather use something git-based (like > >> gitorious or github); > > > > OK, if the place has project home pages, bug reporting / issue tracking, > > and team-assisting organization (I'm not familiar with those places). > > I've been wanting a reason to get more familiar with Git. > > > I think neither of those fully qualifies: gitorious has just > repositories and a wiki (but has projects), and github has all the > features, but is person-centered instead of project-centered. Frankly, I > don't know of a launchpad equivalent for git. But maybe only a wiki > would be good enough? After taking a look at GitHub and some articles about collaborating there, I'm still unclear about how we should use it. I don't understand what collaboration structures are possible. I've got the impression that it's not possible to have the primary repo controlled by multiple people, one person controls it and others fork and request the controller to merge, is that correct? Maybe we could create an account which all maintainers access (assuming simultaneous different logins are possible)? How does bug/issue reporting/tracking collaboration work? Gitorious looks okay except for bug reporting. I think it's not okay to require people to edit a wiki to report bugs, because that would piss me off and we'll get inconsistently formed/organized stuff we'll go crazy trying to keep track of. After looking more at Git, I think it is cooler than Bazaar. Unsure, -- : Derick ----------------------------------------------------------------
