"Andreas Rottmann" wrote:
> As Marco is interested  in splitting SSAX from xitomatl as
> well, I thought this would  make a good first post for the
> wak-discuss mailing list. I've now preliminary versions of
> SSAX and  sxml-tools for pushing to gitorious,  but I need
> still need to do do some testing.

Thanks!  My days have such  a small 24-hours duration that I
still have to start looking at the code... :(

> Also, I'd like to support PLT/Racket with the Wak packages,

"Racket"?  Was  it not a 1st  April joke?  Or  is *this* the
actual joke? :)

> and hence propose a policy of not using version numbers in
> libraries, as they are not portable -- opinions?

Sheesh, I am the only one desiring version numbers...
-- 
Marco Maggi

Reply via email to