At 20:17 22/01/2009, Johannes Luber wrote: >Actually, I don't know how pointers are treated, but I'd be >surprised if the standard formatters don't handle this case >themselves as it is a general case with using references >instead value types in member fields.
Is it an actual pointer (unsafe something *) or is it just a reference-type field? Because binary formatters handle the latter perfectly fine; they can even cope properly with cycles in the object graph (which is what will be the case here -- parent->child->parent). The XmlSerializer can't (it's not a binary formatter), but the SoapFormatter can (because it is, even though it outputs XML). List: http://www.antlr.org/mailman/listinfo/antlr-interest Unsubscribe: http://www.antlr.org/mailman/options/antlr-interest/your-email-address --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "il-antlr-interest" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/il-antlr-interest?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
