Sorry about that, I'm trying to setup a walker that will know what to do with 
"OR" and "AND" operators.  I have the parser setup so that the AST is nicely 
formed with expr such as (< a 3).  I'm able to walk and evaluate these simple 
expr too. But! when I walk (or (and (< a 3) (< b 3)) (< c 3)) I'm stumped.

This must have been solved before and I would guess that there is probably a 
design pattern for walking boolean AST.

Thanks,
Scott

-----Original Message-----
From: Oliver Zeigermann [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thu 1/22/2009 4:19 AM
To: Priolo, Scott
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [antlr-interest] Tree Evaluation with Logical Operators (AND and 
OR)
 
Hi!

Not quite sure what your problem is. Are you asking how an AST for a
logical expression might look like? Or the grammar that creates it? Or
the tree grammar that walks it? Or something else?

-Oliver


2009/1/22 Priolo, Scott <[email protected]>:
> Hello,
>
>
>
> I've searched high and low and can't find a reference to describe the
> Logical Operators (and, or) design pattern for Tree Evaluation (after
> purchasing the book I came up empty handed too).
>
>
>
> Any help?
>
>
>
> Thanks.
>
>
>
> List: http://www.antlr.org/mailman/listinfo/antlr-interest
> Unsubscribe:
> http://www.antlr.org/mailman/options/antlr-interest/your-email-address
>
>


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"il-antlr-interest" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/il-antlr-interest?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

List: http://www.antlr.org/mailman/listinfo/antlr-interest
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.antlr.org/mailman/options/antlr-interest/your-email-address

Reply via email to