Thanks Jim. What I am doing in the mean time is just replicating my entire tree grammar for each of the two passes. I suspect given my file sizes are not large this should not be a problem.
--- On Sun, 2/15/09, Jim Idle <[email protected]> wrote: > From: Jim Idle <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [antlr-interest] subtrees which I don't care about and .* > To: > Cc: [email protected] > Date: Sunday, February 15, 2009, 7:30 PM > Carter Cheng wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I was spending sometime with my tree grammar today and > noticed that the .* rules dont seem to properly match/ignore > subtrees and instead generate an error upon encountering > DOWN. > > > > If I am correct about this, what is the proper way of > creating tree grammars where I am only interested in a > subset of the rules in the generated tree? Is there some > method for doing this using grammar inheritance? > > > There are changes for this in the latest Java source that > have yet to > come in to the latest C source,so I suspect that you are > running in to > the need for those changes. > > Jim > > List: http://www.antlr.org/mailman/listinfo/antlr-interest > Unsubscribe: > http://www.antlr.org/mailman/options/antlr-interest/your-email-address List: http://www.antlr.org/mailman/listinfo/antlr-interest Unsubscribe: http://www.antlr.org/mailman/options/antlr-interest/your-email-address --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "il-antlr-interest" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/il-antlr-interest?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
