Ok sorry for my last mail (noise), I wasn't understanding the
ANTLR-381. Thanks for the fix.

c.

On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 1:17 AM, Gavin Lambert <[email protected]> wrote:
> You can fix it by creating a subrule:


At 20:40 28/02/2009, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote:
>Bug or feature though?  It seems inconsistent for what appear
>to be two semantically equivalent constructs to be totally
>fine in the one case and a silent failure in the other.

List: http://www.antlr.org/mailman/listinfo/antlr-interest
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.antlr.org/mailman/options/antlr-interest/your-email-address

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"il-antlr-interest" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/il-antlr-interest?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to