Kaleb Pederson wrote: > In looking at LLVM a bit more closely, although both the FAQ and the > features page mention full C++ support,
"full C++ support" - heh, that would be impossible ;) Seems like pretty much any random sequence of characters would be valid C++. > One note on David Wigg's C++ grammar, it seemed well documented > although, IIRC, it used a slightly patched version of ANTLR or its > runtime which makes it a bit more difficult to use than would be > typical. IIRC, Wigg's C++ grammar chokes if you ever give it enough ugly C++ to chew on. As Terrence quips in his book "Back when C++ was almost parsable...". Andy > > --Kaleb > List: http://www.antlr.org/mailman/listinfo/antlr-interest Unsubscribe: http://www.antlr.org/mailman/options/antlr-interest/your-email-address --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "il-antlr-interest" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/il-antlr-interest?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
