Jim, On 4/9/2009 11:43 AM, Jim Idle wrote: > Christopher Schultz wrote: >> ANTLR folks, >> >> >> It seems like the most logical fix is to create a new top-level >> production that just says: >> >> return=expr (EOF!) >> >> ...and remove the EOF entirely from my 'expr' production. >> > Yes - that is the correct way to handle that. > > Jim
Thanks! After I posted, I went ahead and just did it and all of my unit tests passed (including a new one ;). Other than that, does my grammar look okay? -chris
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
List: http://www.antlr.org/mailman/listinfo/antlr-interest Unsubscribe: http://www.antlr.org/mailman/options/antlr-interest/your-email-address
