Let's hear the details, Sam! :) Ter On Apr 9, 2009, at 1:38 AM, Sam Harwell wrote:
> I’ve made a few posts about this in the past, and it looks like > another one is on the way. I designed a new, much easier, robust, > and general way to make a syntax highlighter from a grammar, and it > even allows clean “stacking” of lexers. As a quick example, my > primary grammar recognizes a block comment, but it doesn’t recognize > Doxygen syntax within that comment. By stacking a Doxygen-style > fragment lexer in the colorizer, and telling it to post-process any > token of primary type “DOC_COMMENT”, I ended up with this. > > I’d give the gory details now, but it’s 3:30am – just had to share > because figuring this out is what kept me up! I can’t wait to see > multi-level lexer stacking for my StringTemplate highlighter. J > > <image001.png> > > List: http://www.antlr.org/mailman/listinfo/antlr-interest > Unsubscribe: > http://www.antlr.org/mailman/options/antlr-interest/your-email-address List: http://www.antlr.org/mailman/listinfo/antlr-interest Unsubscribe: http://www.antlr.org/mailman/options/antlr-interest/your-email-address --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "il-antlr-interest" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/il-antlr-interest?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
