Sam,
Good point.
Looks like StdCParser.g was written before the C99 standard:
// John D. Mitchell ([email protected]), Jul 12, 1997
...and the GnuCParser.g written not much later:
// Monty Zukowski ([email protected]) April 28, 1998
So they must be based on C89 or C90.
Andy
Sam Barnett-Cormack wrote:
> Andy Tripp wrote:
>> FWIW, I found and fixed a problem in the "cgram" grammar
>> GnuCParser.g and StdCParser.g. They didn't recognize declarations
>> coming after statements in a compoundStatement, like this:
>>
>> f() {
>> printf("hello");
>> int i;
>> }
>>
>> This is allowed in the C99 standard, section 6.8.2, and
>> by the GCC manual section 5.26 "Mixed Declarations and Code".
>
> And explicitly not allowed by earlier "standard" (eg ISO, K&R) C
> standards... do we document what standard StdCPardser is meant to target?
>
List: http://www.antlr.org/mailman/listinfo/antlr-interest
Unsubscribe:
http://www.antlr.org/mailman/options/antlr-interest/your-email-address
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"il-antlr-interest" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/il-antlr-interest?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
