On Aug 25, 2009, at 2:19 PM, Sam Barnett-Cormack wrote:
> David-Sarah Hopwood wrote: >> Terence Parr wrote: >>> hi. not sure what's wrong with the doxygen..can you be more >>> specific? >> >> Suppose someone wants their javadoc implementation to include links >> into ANTLR classes. They could run javadoc on the full ANTLR source, >> or they could just use the "-link <url>" option of javadoc to point >> to somewhere on the ANTLR site. The latter is much easier, and >> doesn't >> require them to ship the ANTLR documentation with their own >> documentation. > > Specifically, it has to be javadoc because of the specific directoy > structures and suchlike used by javadoc, including a specific file I > forget the name of, that it uses to figure out which classes are under > which URL. thanks everyone. I see the issue now. Yes, ANTLR should have a standard documentation but unfortunately we have doxygen at the moment. since it is just Java, though, can I just run Java doc on everything and put it at a standard place on the website? It would have to include a version number as you say. ter List: http://www.antlr.org/mailman/listinfo/antlr-interest Unsubscribe: http://www.antlr.org/mailman/options/antlr-interest/your-email-address --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "il-antlr-interest" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/il-antlr-interest?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
