> I love the "design pattern" element, as it is following the same > feeling > as design patterns - and you'd hardly be the first to port the idea to > another domain.
yep :) > I guess the problem is that "language design patterns" sounds like > you're designing languages. yeah, it's ambiguous. we could add a hyphen but... ugly > How about "Design Patterns for Language > Implementation", or are we *not* excluding langauge design, just > wanting > to make sure it's clear that implementation is there as well? Yeah, we sort of went that direction but something short. I really do like the three word title. We are then doing the implementation stuff in the subtitle at the moment. I guess that would be clear if the subtitle has the implementation word. T List: http://www.antlr.org/mailman/listinfo/antlr-interest Unsubscribe: http://www.antlr.org/mailman/options/antlr-interest/your-email-address --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "il-antlr-interest" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/il-antlr-interest?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
