Terence Parr wrote: > On Aug 27, 2009, at 2:34 PM, Sam Barnett-Cormack wrote: >> I still think "Language Design Patterns" is misleading, really, as >> it's not really about the languages, it's about recognisers and >> other implementation issues. It's design, in the sense of the design >> of the recogniser. > > If you assume that design is an adjective the patterns, then it is a > perfect title. oh well.
To me, it reads with "design patterns" as a compound noun - it seems to say it's design patterns for languages. And I love that design patterns is there. -- Sam Barnett-Cormack List: http://www.antlr.org/mailman/listinfo/antlr-interest Unsubscribe: http://www.antlr.org/mailman/options/antlr-interest/your-email-address --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "il-antlr-interest" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/il-antlr-interest?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
