You haven't shown your revised grammar. However, in the old grammar the xmldecl rule says that an attribute is required, so feeding in just:
xml will not satisfy xmldecl. -- Graham At 10/13/2009 11:24 AM, Evan Metheny wrote: >Thanks for the response Graham > >> Fragments can only be part of another lexer rule, they are not stand-alone >token-producing lexer rules. Henxe the missing token exception. > >OK that makes sense, when changing fragment GENERIC_ID to GENERIC_ID. >The "xmldecl" rule breaks with "mismatched set exception" when trying >to recognize "xml". Thats what i was trying to explain with: > >> >> Also: >>> I cant >>>understand why it would break the recognition of "XML" when its before >>>the attribute call. >> >> So far as I know, there is no impact of order in which the lexer and >parser rules appear in the .g file. > >Thanks > >-Evan List: http://www.antlr.org/mailman/listinfo/antlr-interest Unsubscribe: http://www.antlr.org/mailman/options/antlr-interest/your-email-address --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "il-antlr-interest" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/il-antlr-interest?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
