> > So I think the right thing for me to do is to study the generated code > > for rewrites and mimic the use of the adaptor APIs to link up the > > trees correctly. > > Yes - this is what I was getting at basically. > > Jim
It turned out that it was not useful studying the generated code. However, I ended up solving my problems by using adaptor.addChild(parent, adaptor.dupTree(child)) whenever splicing a tree created earlier in a parse into a new parent. This is probably overkill, with a lot of extra copying of subtrees, but it seemed cleanest and guaranteed to work correctly. -- Franklin List: http://www.antlr.org/mailman/listinfo/antlr-interest Unsubscribe: http://www.antlr.org/mailman/options/antlr-interest/your-email-address --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "il-antlr-interest" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/il-antlr-interest?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
