On 02/24/09 09:19, Sangeeta Misra wrote: > On 02/24/09 08:55, Michael Schuster wrote:
>> but this got me thinking: is there a need for the "base" of the server >> ID to be distinct from the server group (name)? > > What is a server is being included in two seperate groups? Then at least > in one case one of the servers in the server group will have a server > with a base that is different than group name. Or are you planning to > have a server have multiple server ids ? according to Kacheong, it is feasible to have the same back end server for different rules behave be treated as a seperate entity for each of these rules (please correct me if I'm wrong), so I see no reason not to do it that way. Michael -- Michael Schuster http://blogs.sun.com/recursion Recursion, n.: see 'Recursion'
