> In the summer of 2005, Red Hat sponsored several projects with Google's > Summer of Code. One of these projects was named "Kadischi". Led by Darko > > In the summer of 2006, David Zeuthen of Red Hat revealed a Live CD based > on his work from a project called Pilgrim. David is a developer for the
>From the posts on the fedora-livecd list, it seems to me that kadischi is meant for creating a customised one-off ISO for personal use, while pilgrim is more suited for producing live CDs on a very large scale. Is this true? If yes, to what extent? I have not asked on the fedora-livecd list itself since I was a bit blown away by the terminologies. > Thus, we have two codebases in Fedora that are designed to produce a > Live CD. I just tried the Fedora 7 Test 1 live cd yesterday. Fedora 7 will have the 'install from live CD' feature (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/FeatureLiveCD?highlight=%28CategoryFedora7Features%29). > Additionally, Jesse Keating has a distribution compose tool called > "Pungi" - the project is aimed at making a public / free tool to spin > installation trees/isos of Fedora. In simple terms, does that mean that one can use a customised Fedora based distribution using Pungi? From http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/FeatureCustomDistro?highlight=%28CategoryFedora7Features%29 http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/FeatureFedoraTargettedSpins?highlight=%28CategoryFedora7Features%29 http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/FeatureUsePungi?highlight=%28CategoryFedora7Features%29 I believe that Pungi will be used to enable anyone build a customised Fedora, while kadischi or pilgrim take care of the live CD aspect. Is it so? Regards, Debarshi -- After the game the king and the pawn go into the same box. -- Italian proverb _______________________________________________ Ilug-cal-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://list.ilug-cal.org/mailman/listinfo/ilug-cal-discuss
