Hi Riddhi,
actually I agree with you about xwpe.I found it slightly cumbersome and
pretty soon forgot about it.For me,emacs is the best IDE around.
Bye,
-----------------------------------------------------
Rajarshi Guha | Do molecular biologists
Dept Of Chemistry | wear designer genes ??
IIT Kharagpur |
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-----------------------------------------------------
On Sat, 18 Sep 1999, Riddhi Barman wrote:
> >for the events - much like Visual (*)++.Another IDE that comes to mind is
> >xwpe - though not a pure GUI based IDE,it's more reminiscent of the Turbo
> >C IDE for DOS.
>
>
> Hi,
> I don't want to start off another set of flames, but here's another
> purely personal opinion : I often have to work with wpe/xwpe in Linux ,and I
> hate to say this, but though in look it is similar to the Turbo C IDE for
> DOS, the DOS IDE beats wpe hands down when it comes to plain usability !
>
> Just an opinion.. :-) Please direct all flames to /dev/null !! :-)
>
> Riddhi
>
>
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the body
> "unsubscribe ilug-cal" and an empty subject line.
> FAQ: http://www.ilug-cal.org/help/faq_list.html
>
--
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the body
"unsubscribe ilug-cal" and an empty subject line.
FAQ: http://www.ilug-cal.org/help/faq_list.html
