<snip>
> 1. Anything below Borland C / C++ version 3.1 compiler for DOS is
> inherently unreliable. Upgrade to 3.1 if you are working in DOS.I had a
> similar problem with BC version 1.0. Are you using TC ? They suck :(
</snip>
IMHO TC/BC is /was the best c compiler i have seen under dos. my experience
runs only upto m$ C , symantec and watcom C. IIRC a large number of TSR
programs used to be written in TC 2. Turbo tools for tc 1.5 springs to mind
. the excellent C library from Blaise computing (look in th BCL) is asnother
commercial example. could u elucidate what exactly 'sucks'.
<snip>
Tip : Do not trust the documentation/help
</snip>
what do u look at then - the M$ docs ? IMHO the borland docs used to set the
standards.
shanker
ps - exams over - I'm back!
--
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the body
"unsubscribe ilug-cal" and an empty subject line.
FAQ: http://www.ilug-cal.org/help/faq_list.html
