ya, saw that a few days ago
there is a good reply to this at linuxdevices.com (editorial section)
cheers
Sayamindu

On Tue, 2001-12-18 at 14:55, soumit mukherjee wrote:
> I know this may be an old news but still  check this out at microsoft site.
> 
> Why Microsoft Windows XP Embedded and Not Embedded Linux?
> 
> 
>             
>             
> 
> 
>             
>             
>       Selecting an operating system (OS) platform is one of the first decisions an 
>embedded developer must make for any given device design. Whether you are considering 
>migrating from a proprietary to commercial platform, or from one commercial platform 
>to another, the objectives are the same: accelerated time to market; a solid, 
>extensible OS core that can be used across all projects; superior technologies that 
>support differentiation and address emerging opportunities; and predictability over 
>the device lifecycle. In addition, you want it at the lowest possible total cost from 
>a reputable vendor who will support you throughout the process.
> 
>       For smart, connected, 32-bit devices requiring rich applications, Microsoft� 
>Windows� XP Embedded delivers six distinct advantages over Linux in the embedded 
>space:
> 
>         a.. Integrated: An all-inclusive, tool set that delivers faster OS and 
>application development time 
>         b.. Comprehensive: An OS foundation with proven performance and reliability 
>         c.. Unmatched: A technology portfolio for building the next generation of 
>devices 
>         d.. Interoperable: Broad interoperability with Microsoft� .NET� enabled 
>applications and services that span devices, PCs, servers and the Web 
>         e.. Proven: A long-term business model that is better aligned with your 
>business 
>         f.. Global: A worldwide system to support and speed overall product 
>development 
>      
> 
>  



--
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the body
"unsubscribe ilug-cal" and an empty subject line.
FAQ: http://www.ilug-cal.org/help/faq_list.html

Reply via email to