Microsoft Bails out Corel...
A Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) filing reveals
some details about Microsoft's bailout of Corel, details that were conspicuously
missing when the companies announced a $135 million deal last week. In addition
to specifying the resolved legal problems between the two companies, which
involves Microsoft's patented IntelliSense technology, the SEC filing explains
how the two companies will bring .NET to the Linux platform. And interestingly,
this revelation ties in nicely with Microsoft's apparently aborted attempt to
port its own Office suite to Linux. With that strategy's failure, Microsoft has
done the next best thing--ensure that Corel's Office suite, which is compatible
with Microsoft's version, continues its Linux-based existence until the Linux
.NET components are in place. Linux proponents are divided about the disclosure:
It is seemingly good news for the OS's continued existence but bad news because
the Linux community doesn't like to see Microsoft inching into its
territory.
In the 97-page SEC filing, Microsoft agrees not to sue
Corel for violating several of its Office-related technology patents. The 
patentsinclude "Method and
system for selecting and executing arithmetic
functions and the like," dating back to 1994; "Method and system for
customizing a UI in a computer system," also from 1994; and "Text
checking application programming interface," a 1995 patent that covers
Microsoft's IntelliSense technology, which connects applications to a backend
spelling checker and "text checking engine." In other words, Microsoft
patented the way its spelling and grammar checkers work in Office applications,
where squiggly red and green lines appear under words and sentences that might
need to be changed. Corel WordPerfect, like many modern Office applications,
copied this feature from Microsoft Office. Microsoft hasn't issued Corel a
license to use these technologies; instead, Microsoft supplied a legal covenant
under which Corel can continue to do so. The distinction between the two is a
bit unclear, but Corel apparently can continue to use these features while its
multiyear agreement with Microsoft is in effect.
The legal issues were, of course, an interesting unstated
fact during the announcement, but more people speculated about the possibility
that Corel, which has its own Linux distribution, would somehow work with
Microsoft to port .NET to the Linux platform. The SEC filing makes this
possibility very real. The two companies have entered into a 3-year agreement
under which Microsoft can at any time require Corel to port some or all of the
.NET technologies to Linux. If Microsoft decides that it wants Corel to port the .NET 
technology to
Linux, Microsoft will provide Corel with full access to the
.NET source code, and Corel will assign at least 20 full-time  programmers
and 10 testers to the effort, which will be completed within 1 year. The
agreement contains numerous statements about the quality of the people who will
be involved and the work that will be completed. In  essence, Microsoft
won't have to pay for the porting effort but will receive full ownership of the
completed product. For a company like Corel, which was nearing bankruptcy, this
deal is essentially a deal with the devil, one in which the company clearly
wasn't bargaining from a position of leverage. Corel's agreement to port .NET to
Linux is even described as a "work-made-for-hire" agreement, which
means that the $135 million bailout is all the money the company will ever see
for this effort; Corel won't receive royalties or future rights for its .NET efforts.
Corel also has agreed to continue its license for
Microsoft's Visual Basic for Applications (VBA), which Corel incorporated into 
WordPerfect Office
last year. And Corel will prominently support Microsoft's
Windows Media Technologies in all of its relevant Windows-based products.
Additionally, all Corel Windows-based products released on or after January 1
will qualify for the Windows Logo, which will ensure that those applications
meet certain Microsoft-ordained standards.
As for Corel's WordPerfect Office suite, the company has
agreed that the next major upgrade, due next year, will incorporate support for
.NET software services. Corel has also agreed to support any future .NET
technologies in its Office products no later than 6 months after Microsoft
publicly releases them. Additionally, Corel has agreed  to make its Office
product services "consumable" as .NET services, using Microsoft
standards. And Corel will bundle into its products support for any applicable
.NET Building Block Services, which Microsoft will supply. The agreement reveals
an interesting product--Microsoft can decide to release a new developer product
called "Visual Studio for Applications (VSA) . . . which is intended to
provide the ability to customize and extend middle-tier components of
distributed applications based upon the .NET Frameworks," the agreement
states. Corel will support this product if it is released. In the one bone
thrown to Corel, the company can still release versions of its products that
don't incorporate .NET; however, Corel must put as much effort into its .NET
versions as it does into its non-.NET versions. Overall, the agreement is a stunning
declaration of what $135 million can buy. The SEC filing confirms fears that
Corel will become Microsoft's lapdog; the agreement is decidedly one-sided in
Microsoft's favor. And comparisons to Microsoft's bailouts of Apple and Borland,
while appropriate, suddenly seem fairer to those two companies. Of course, from
Corel's standpoint, just being in business is far more desirable than
bankruptcy. But Corel clearly paid a heavy price for its continued existence.
Source:  Copyright
2000, Windows 2000 Magazine


---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.346 / Virus Database: 194 - Release Date: 04/10/02


--
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the body
"unsubscribe ilug-cal" and an empty subject line.
FAQ: http://www.ilug-cal.org/help/faq_list.html

Reply via email to