> lug meetings are not the social face of linux. they're the exact > opposite. linux doesn't have much of a social face yet. when it gets > one, lug-s will wither. one doesn't need specialised groups to do > things people normally do anyway. case to point: ever seen a "windows > users' group"? > </troll> the purpose of lugs is to make linux ppl socialise and help each other. In that way ... lug meetings are supposed to be socials ... and as for a windows users group ... there are mailing lists for windows users also ... so that makes them a group ... as your rule book says !! > where did you get that idea? shouldn't you verify something before > saying it in public? actually, all members of this list are members of > ilug-cal. the rule says, in order to be a member, you got to enroll in > the list OR attend one lug meeting. so that makes you a member, too.
did'nt wanna start a flame war here but .. i belong to that school of thought where unless and until u r not heard of in a group ... u r not a member ... rules apart ... i don't consider myself also a member here .. i'm more of an observer (a lurker as pk says) -- To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the body "unsubscribe ilug-cal" and an empty subject line. FAQ: http://www.ilug-cal.org/node.php?id=3
