FORWARDED TO THE GROUP

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: SPAM - [ffii] Linus Torvalds & Alan Cox call on MEPs to vote against software patents patents
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2003 09:49:16 +0200 (CEST)
From: PILCH Hartmut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


FFII News -- For Immediate Release -- Please Redistribute
+++ +++ +++ +++ +++ +++ +++ +++ +++ +++ +++ +++ +++ +++
  Linus Torvalds and Alan Cox call on MEPs to vote against software patents

2003/09/22

For immediate Release

   The two chief architects of the Linus operating system kernel, Linus
   Torvalds from Finland and Alan Cox from UK, ask for effective
   limitations to patentability in their letter to the members of the
   European Parliament. In particular, they recommend MEPs to follow the
   FFII voting list. The vote on the Directive will be on Wednesday and
   it is expected to be a very close one.

Details

   Linus Torvalds, the original creator and current maintainer of the
   Linux operating system kernel, comments:

     The experiences from the USA demonstrate that software patents
     don't benefit anyone but perhaps the patent lawyers. They will just
     weaken the market and increase spending on patents and litigation,
     at the expense of technological innovation and research.

He continues:

     We hope that the members of European Parliament see these negative
     sides and don't push the same chaos to the old continent.

   Alan Cox, creator and maintainer of large parts of the Linux
   kernel, working for Redhat in UK, notes:

     Currenly, the companies are moving programming jobs offshore. The
     huge move away from the USA is not entirely driven by pricing but
     by patent litigation and risk. Companies create a US holding
     company for the IPR which licenses it to a non US body to write the
     software overseas and import it, so as to reduce risk.

He stresses:

     Adopting the same kind of patents in the EU will drive thousands of
     EU programming jobs overseas, too.

   In their letter, Torvalds and Cox set three requests for the
   Directive. Firstly, it should clarify limits of patentability so that
   computer programs and business methods really cannot be patented as
   such. Secondly, the Directive should make sure that patents cannot be
   abused to avoid technical competition by preventing interoperability
   of competing software. Finally, the patents should not be allowed to
   be used to prevent publication of information.

Annotated Links

   -> [12]Linus Torvals & Alan Cox 2003/09/22: Letter to the European
          Parliament
          explains dangers of software patents and chances of the
          European Parliament to save Europe from these dangers this
          week, recommends that MEPs should support the voting
          recommendations of FFII.

   -> [13]EFFI version of Letter
          The letter was first published by the Electronic Frontier
          Foundation of Finnland.

   -> [14]Same in Finnish
   -> [15]Same in Swedish
   -> [16]EFFI version of PR
          The PR was drafted by the Electronic Frontier Foundation of
          Finnland.

   -> [17]Same in Finnish
   -> [18]Europarl 2003/09 Software Patent Directive Amendments: Real vs
          Fake Limits
          The European Parliament is scheduled to decide about the
          Software Patent Directive on September 24th. The directive as
          proposed by the European Commission demolishes the basic
          structure of the current law (Art 52 of the European Patent
          Convention) and replaces it by the Trilateral Standard worked
          out by US, European and Japanese Patent Offices in 2000,
          according to which all "computer-implemented" problem solutions
          are patentable inventions. Some members of the Parliament have
          proposed amendments which aim to uphold the stricter invention
          concept of the European Patent Convention, whereas others push
          for unlimited patentability according to the Trilateral
          Standard, albeit in a restrictive rhetorical clothing. We
          attempt a comparative analysis of all proposed amendments, so
          as to help decisionmakers recognise whether they are voting for
          real or fake limits on patentability.

Contact

   mail:
          media at ffii org

media-fi at ffii org

info at effi org

   phone:
          Hartmut Pilch +49-89-18979927

More Contacts to be supplied upon request

About the FFII -- www.ffii.org

   The Foundation for a Free Information Infrastructure (FFII) is a
   non-profit association registered in Munich, which is dedicated to the
   spread of data processing literacy. FFII supports the development of
   public information goods based on copyright, free competition, open
   standards. More than 300 members, 500 companies and 30,000 supporters
   have entrusted the FFII to act as their voice in public policy
   questions in the area of exclusion rights (intellectual property) in
   data processing.

Permanent URL of this Press Release

http://swpat.ffii.org/news/03/linu0922/index.en.html

References

12. http://swpat.ffii.org/papers/eubsa-swpat0202/linus0309/index.en.html
13. http://www.effi.org/patentit/patents_torvalds_cox.html
14. http://www.effi.org/patentit/patents_torvalds_cox_fi.html
15. http://www.effi.org/patentit/patents_torvalds_cox_sv.txt
16. http://www.effi.org/julkaisut/tiedotteet/pressrelease-2003-09-22.html
17. http://www.effi.org/julkaisut/tiedotteet/lehdistotiedote-2003-09-22.html
18. http://swpat.ffii.org/papers/eubsa-swpat0202/plen0309/index.en.html



_______________________________________________ News mailing list (un)subscribe via http://petition.ffii.org/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ffii.org/mailman/listinfo/news


-- ************************************ ** Our personal Homepages ** ** http://neeraja-rohit.cjb.net ** ************************************ ** Visit Us.. Surprise Us ... ** ************************************


-- To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the body "unsubscribe ilug-cal" and an empty subject line. FAQ: http://www.ilug-cal.org/node.php?id=3

Reply via email to