Sharninder There are plenty of comparison tables floating around on the NG's, with various perceptions.
Personally, I have been using VirtualPC since Connectix days, and works very well. Less power hungry then VMWare for sure. I recall using a device, which just had a Winduh's driver, we were able to run it on an iMac using Virtual Pc, where OS X could identify the device via the VPc layer. Am yet to upgrade to the VPc'2005 beta lying in my MSDN cd's, the first major upgrade,ever since Microsoft bought Connectix. I use VPc for running an old Caledra tux, Fedora, Dos 6.22, Win95 and Win98 on my XP box. Rajesh ----- Original Message ----- From: "Sharninder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, February 01, 2005 10:23 AM Subject: Re: [ilug-cal] Another VmWare type of thing ? <snip> > > AFAIK Virtual PC is an i386 emulator for MacOS and its > pretty good at its job, from what I've heard. > A comparison table for emulators would need a lot of > research cause there are emulators for architectures > as antique as Commodore and then the popular atari and > nintendo emulators, OS emulators such as wine and > BIOS/system emulators such as Bochs. Btw, bochs is a > pretty nice x86 emulator too. I managed to start a > Debian installation on WinNT once with it, but it was > too slow for me to use. Perhaps the 256MB RAM NT > system was to be blamed !! > -- > Sharninder > -- To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the body "unsubscribe ilug-cal" and an empty subject line. FAQ: http://www.ilug-cal.org/node.php?id=3
