-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Sun, 04 Sep 2005 21:14:38 +0530
"A. Mani" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> On Friday 02 September 2005 16:20, J.Bakshi wrote:
> > On Sun, 28 Aug 2005 18:55:42 +0530
> >
> > "A. Mani" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Friday 26 August 2005 15:38, J.Bakshi wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > I like to ask a specific question to KDE users. what is the present
> > > > state of KDE ? means does it become more slower and resource hungry or
> > > > faster ? you can ask cpu speed, ram , cache etc. etc....   but I like
> > > > to know how KDE performs on the PC ( pls mention the config ) you are
> > > > using. mine is KDE 3.3 , 128MB DDR, Sempron 1.5GHz, UDMA HDD, 128K L1,
> > > > 256K L2. UDMA is activated in the kernel 2.4.17
> > > > KMail needs considerable time to up. also there is a delay to up the
> > > > menu.
> > > >
> > > > thanks
> > >
> > > It is much faster than before. ...provided you have at least 192 MB of
> > > RAM...the processor speed is less relevant... I have seen it (kde3.2) run
> > > well on via 550 Mhz with 192 Mb of ram. For your config the ram is the
> > > only problem... as it is try to use more spartan settings.
> >
> > I also try with an additional 256MB so total  256MB+128MB but haven't found
> > any speed increment -:(
> >
> 
> Odd, which distro are you using ?  

Debian sarge (testing)
Qt: 3.3.3
KDE: 3.3.2
KMail: 1.7.1

UDMA support is active

$] hdparm  /dev/hda

/dev/hda:
 multcount    =  0 (off)
 IO_support   =  1 (32-bit)
 unmaskirq    =  1 (on)
 using_dma    =  1 (on)
 keepsettings =  0 (off)
 readonly     =  0 (off)
 readahead    = 256 (on)
 geometry     = 16383/255/63, sectors = 40060403712, start = 0

here is the transfer rate

$]hdparm -t /dev/hda

/dev/hda:
 Timing buffered disk reads:  144 MB in  3.00 seconds =  47.99 MB/sec

please tell me what else I can do to increase the speed of KDE and Kmail, as I 
really miss those technologies.

>Did you compile the kde in the wrong way... 
> in about 10hrs ? Try to search the kde-lists... you might find something. I 
> do not  know about any such arch specific problems. kmail may take about 2sec 
> to start. For your present config ...it is very possible to compile from 
> sources. 
> 
> Distro specific performance : KDE is usually fastest on slackware.
> 
> 
> 
> A. Mani
> Member, Cal. Math. Soc
> 
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the body
> "unsubscribe ilug-cal" and an empty subject line.
> FAQ: http://www.ilug-cal.org/node.php?id=3
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDHBsJ14IQxY9uOSYRAv0UAKCGQmZ1MPNn3GIVIB8I83jnKVaLdQCcD4SJ
MgiVh7Oh6DEd2FOXHvjMCOA=
=NkPI
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the body
"unsubscribe ilug-cal" and an empty subject line.
FAQ: http://www.ilug-cal.org/node.php?id=3

Reply via email to