Hello Dipankar, > From: dipankar das <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > On Wednesday 01 March 2006 21:20, GOSSAMER PENGUIN wrote: > > Â without malice to anyone , ilug-cal is very much a "fledgling > > group" existing mianly > > now in this list . > > It will be very nice and good point to make it full of action, a very good > thing to do. But, i share Sankarshan Mukhopadhyay's point: what is the harm > in making our good old ilug-cal as good as we should want our lug to be, but > what is the point in forking it into something like lug-bengal or something > like that? Lest I be misunderstood, I want to make it clear that I never proposed forking ilug-cal, rather I just had a random thought of broadening its scope so that it can encompasses other linux users group in the state (sort of a parent body of all lugs).
Anyway, in my last post I had myself pooh-poohed the plan of ilug-bengal in favor of strengthening and making ilug-cal more active. Cheers. -- Surendra Singhi http://ssinghi.kreeti.com,http://www.kreeti.com See the Latest news at - http://news.kreeti.com -- To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the body "unsubscribe ilug-cal" and an empty subject line. FAQ: http://www.ilug-cal.org/node.php?id=3
