'Restrictive licenses and patents' is the apt term to carry the spirit of the clause. It is just a wish list bug :-).
With apologies for top posting Anivar On 3/20/09, Vikram Vincent <[email protected]> wrote: >> Just Noticed a bug in CPIM Manifesto >> >> >>> Following are some of the highlights of the policy - >>> - Promoting Free Software and other such new technologies, which are free >>> from >>> monopoly ownership through copyrights or patents; >> >> The problem on above statement is Free Software is based on Copyright. > > Copyright can be used for monopolistic purposes. The FS version of > Copyright is Copyleft but anyway... > _______________________________________________ > Fsf-friends mailing list > [email protected] > http://mm.gnu.org.in/mailman/listinfo/fsf-friends > -- Sent from my mobile device --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ "Freedom is the only law". "Freedom Unplugged" http://www.ilug-tvm.org You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ilug-tvm" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For details visit the website: www.ilug-tvm.org or the google group page: http://groups.google.com/group/ilug-tvm?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
