I think I was totally wrong about Diaspora, and possibility of rules enforced at a later stage.
An Wikipedia says, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diaspora_%28social_network%29 The social network is not owned by any one person or entity, keeping it safe from corporate take-overs, advertising, and other threats. In September 2011 the developers stated, "...our distributed design means no big corporation will ever control Diaspora. Diaspora* will never sell your social life to advertisers, and you won’t have to conform to someone’s arbitrary rules or look over your shoulder before you speak." hmmm... need to read more about it. -- Anoop Jacob Thomas -- "Freedom is the only law". "Freedom Unplugged" http://www.ilug-tvm.org You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ilug-tvm" group. To control your subscription visit http://groups.google.co.in/group/ilug-tvm/subscribe To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For details visit the google group page: http://groups.google.com/group/ilug-tvm?hl=en
