On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 9:16 AM, Venkatraman S <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 2:35 PM, Swapnil Bhartiya <
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> > Religion is a boundary, it has only taken people apart. It has never
> been,
> > never intended to be, a bridge.
> >
>
> -1. Nope.
>
> Humans decide what 'religion' is. Religion is a label - Hindu, Islam, etc
> etc are mere labels - they denote each school of thought. A religion was
> conceived by a set of people - it was conceived to be their doctrine -
> something that they should follow as part of life and hence they needed a
> SuperMan('God') whom they could trust in(again, an object of their own
> imagination).
>
> And it is very much normal to have clashes between different school of
> thoughts - and i truly support and advocate a debate between different
> schools of thoughts - though think that it goes against the funda of
> religion (which was supposed to be set-of-rules followed) by a group of
> ppl,
> and hence this debate would be sheer waste of time.
>
> What you are talking about is 'misunderstood-fundamentalism' - which is
> sheer insanity.
>
>
All this happened a a consequences of an act of seeking truth man when
couldent find the truth he made it up like we do in our exams ;)
--
your caring/loving/sincere/oyoyoy[select it urself]
swamynathan.
_______________________________________________
To unsubscribe, email [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe <password> <address>"
in the subject or body of the message.
http://www.ae.iitm.ac.in/mailman/listinfo/ilugc
