On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 5:46 PM, Bhuvaneswaran A <[email protected]> wrote:
> > AFAIK, Amazon EC2 does not have good reputation > when it comes to uptime. This setup can be used to run "temporary high > volume parallel data processing", or demonstrating a feature, but not > for permanent production sites. > Highly doubt this. My experiences with AWS/S3 has been amazing. I found the ease of managing instances just a click away. Especially, Firefox has a plugin which makes it even more easier for n00bs. S3 makes it much more easier to manage persistent data. I have cc'ed Balaji(popularly known as labsji) with whom i had a chance to work on Sim-OnDemand<http://labsji.wordpress.com/2008/11/03/sim-ondemand-opensim-on-ec2-personal-virtual-world-server/>during its initial stages. I loved my rendezvous on this, and the geeky adventure was worth it. Please contact him off the list if interested (as i dont think he is part of this ML) -V- http://twitter.com/venkasub _______________________________________________ To unsubscribe, email [email protected] with "unsubscribe <password> <address>" in the subject or body of the message. http://www.ae.iitm.ac.in/mailman/listinfo/ilugc
