On Sun, Oct 25, 2009 at 3:44 PM, Girish Venkatachalam >> However, this is false! The reason is that "bc" is a _programmable_ >> calculator. You can define functions in "bc". As far as I could tell, >> "wcalc" is missing this. >> > > No, you can define functions in wcalc as well. > > Check out. I clearly saw that in the man page as well as the online help.
Okay. I have to backtrack here. The rich set of inbuilt functions can surely give bc(1) hang its head in shame and make it irrelevant. But I wonder why wcalc does not have a lex yacc parser for defining user functions. Well well. I am no mathematician. Obviously you should be right. This tool is meant for people like you. -Girish -- Gayatri Hitech web: http://gayatri-hitech.com SpamCheetah Spam filter: http://spam-cheetah.com _______________________________________________ To unsubscribe, email [email protected] with "unsubscribe <password> <address>" in the subject or body of the message. http://www.ae.iitm.ac.in/mailman/listinfo/ilugc
