On Wed, 2010-08-11 at 17:35 +0530, Girish Venkatachalam wrote: > On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 10:11 AM, Kenneth Gonsalves > <[email protected]> wrote: > > hi, > > > > after some years of experimentation, I find a setting of 3.5 on > > spamassassin along with some training eliminates 99% of spam - and > very > > rarely catches non spam. > > Unfortunately a lot of people use spamassassin. > > The issue is with false positives and slowness. > > I have never used it but.
then how do you know about false positives and slowness? -- regards KG http://lawgon.livejournal.com _______________________________________________ ILUGC Mailing List: http://www.ae.iitm.ac.in/mailman/listinfo/ilugc
