On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 5:16 PM, Arulalan T <[email protected]> wrote:
> yup. It may be slower to access the swap area rather than RAM, but it is > much faster than access the data of files which are stored in the hard > disk. > Could you clarify? You initially said you wanted to store in swap instead of RAM. Now you want to store in swap(which is essentially a 2nd class RAM) instead of files in file-system. Do you mean to say you don't want in RAM because you don't want to use precious RAM space but want to use swap as it is faster than accessing other files? -- அகிலன் (Akilan R) [ blog.akilan.in ] *I should have no use for a paradise in which I should be deprived of the right to prefer hell.* --Jean Rostand _______________________________________________ ILUGC Mailing List: http://www.ae.iitm.ac.in/mailman/listinfo/ilugc
