On Tue, 2011-11-08 at 11:57 +0530, 0 wrote: > > > > he refused to speak to ILUGC because ILUGC refused to rename itself > GLUGC > > I hate to hijack the thread, but this is a question I couldn't resist > to > ask. So, we (ilugc) are not in good terms with stallman ? Also, What > is > his philosophy behind GLUGC ?
Stallman has a policy that he will not address a LUG unless it renames itself as a GLUG. In those days Mumbay agreed - so he spoke to them. Chennai refused, so he did not speak. That does not imply any fight with him. He had, and still has a lot of devotees in ILUGC. -- regards Kenneth Gonsalves _______________________________________________ ILUGC Mailing List: http://www.ae.iitm.ac.in/mailman/listinfo/ilugc
