Hi, On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 8:45 PM, A. Mani <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 3:47 PM, Siju George <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 2:16 AM, A. Mani <[email protected]> wrote: >>> On Intel h/w both Debian GNU/kBSD and PCBSD perform pathetically in >>> comparison w.r.t Debian /Ubuntu GNU Linux . >>> >>> http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=debian_wheezybsd_freeze&num=1 >>> Do see the comments. >>> >> >> Welcome to the real world :-) >> >> http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=MTExNDM >> > > commercial BSD is not free BSD. > And netfix obviously is talking about very specific hardware and requirements. > Here we are talking about some other kind of h/w. > >> >> eg: >> >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phoronix_Test_Suite#Controversies >> >> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2011-December/030323.html >> > > If there are problems with the benchmarking , then they should be rectified. > But what other options do we have apart from actually doing it ourselves? > Personally I know, free BSD does not perform as well as say Fedora on > X86-64 for my requirements :)
Please follow the mailing list guidelines (http://www.ilugc.in/content/mailinglist-guidelines) and do not cross-post replies across lists. The post you have replied to on ILUGC list wasn't posted to ILUGC at all and it makes very little sense to those here. Thanks & Regards, Guruprasad _______________________________________________ ILUGC Mailing List: http://www.ae.iitm.ac.in/mailman/listinfo/ilugc
